Brazil vs High income: Forest area
Brazil
4.93 million sq. km
in 2023
High income
18.74 million sq. km
in 2023
Brazil rank
2nd
High income rank
5th
Forest area over time
- Brazil
- High income
How they compare
High income currently reports 18.74 million sq. km against 4.93 million sq. km in Brazil, a difference of 13.81 million sq. km.
That makes High income's figure about 3.8 times Brazil's.
Across all 34 years both countries report, High income has been ahead every year.
Brazil ranks 2nd and High income ranks 5th of 213 countries.
High income has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | High income | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 5.72 million sq. km | 16.79 million sq. km | 11.07 million sq. km | High income |
| 2000s | 5.33 million sq. km | 18.56 million sq. km | 13.22 million sq. km | High income |
| 2010s | 5.05 million sq. km | 18.69 million sq. km | 13.65 million sq. km | High income |
| 2020s | 4.95 million sq. km | 18.74 million sq. km | 13.79 million sq. km | High income |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest area, Brazil or High income?
- High income, at 18.74 million sq. km against 4.93 million sq. km in Brazil as of 2023.
- What is the difference in forest area between Brazil and High income?
- 13.81 million sq. km, with High income ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and High income?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Brazil and High income rank globally for forest area?
- Brazil ranks 2nd and High income ranks 5th of 213 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Forest area (sq. km). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Forest area is land under natural or planted stands of trees of at least 5 meters in situ, whether productive or not, and excludes tree stands in agricultural production systems (for example, in fruit plantations and agroforestry systems) and trees in urban parks and gardens.