Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Malawi: Forest area
Bosnia and Herzegovina
21,879 sq. km
in 2023
Malawi
21,157 sq. km
in 2023
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
103rd
Malawi rank
105th
Forest area over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Malawi
How they compare
Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 21,879 sq. km against 21,157 sq. km in Malawi, a difference of 722 sq. km.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Malawi ahead.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 103rd and Malawi ranks 105th of 214 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Bosnia and Herzegovina averaged higher in 1 and Malawi in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Malawi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 21,559 sq. km | 32,707 sq. km | 11,148 sq. km | Malawi |
| 2000s | 21,076 sq. km | 28,927 sq. km | 7,851 sq. km | Malawi |
| 2010s | 21,530 sq. km | 24,727 sq. km | 3,197 sq. km | Malawi |
| 2020s | 21,879 sq. km | 21,787 sq. km | 92.1 sq. km | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest area, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Malawi?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 21,879 sq. km against 21,157 sq. km in Malawi as of 2023.
- What is the difference in forest area between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Malawi?
- 722 sq. km, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Malawi?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Malawi rank globally for forest area?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 103rd and Malawi ranks 105th of 214 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Forest area (sq. km). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Forest area is land under natural or planted stands of trees of at least 5 meters in situ, whether productive or not, and excludes tree stands in agricultural production systems (for example, in fruit plantations and agroforestry systems) and trees in urban parks and gardens.