Bolivia vs East Asia & Pacific: Forest area
Forest area over time
- Bolivia
- East Asia & Pacific
How they compare
East Asia & Pacific currently reports 6.66 million sq. km against 502,063 sq. km in Bolivia, a difference of 6.16 million sq. km.
That makes East Asia & Pacific's figure about 13.3 times Bolivia's.
Across all 34 years both countries report, East Asia & Pacific has been ahead every year.
Bolivia ranks 14th and East Asia & Pacific ranks 17th of 213 countries.
East Asia & Pacific has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bolivia | East Asia & Pacific | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 565,882 sq. km | 6.38 million sq. km | 5.82 million sq. km | East Asia & Pacific |
| 2000s | 541,945 sq. km | 6.43 million sq. km | 5.89 million sq. km | East Asia & Pacific |
| 2010s | 520,870 sq. km | 6.58 million sq. km | 6.06 million sq. km | East Asia & Pacific |
| 2020s | 505,193 sq. km | 6.65 million sq. km | 6.15 million sq. km | East Asia & Pacific |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest area, Bolivia or East Asia & Pacific?
- East Asia & Pacific, at 6.66 million sq. km against 502,063 sq. km in Bolivia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in forest area between Bolivia and East Asia & Pacific?
- 6.16 million sq. km, with East Asia & Pacific ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia and East Asia & Pacific?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Bolivia and East Asia & Pacific rank globally for forest area?
- Bolivia ranks 14th and East Asia & Pacific ranks 17th of 213 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Forest area (sq. km). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Forest area is land under natural or planted stands of trees of at least 5 meters in situ, whether productive or not, and excludes tree stands in agricultural production systems (for example, in fruit plantations and agroforestry systems) and trees in urban parks and gardens.