Aruba vs Malta: Forest area
Aruba
4.2 sq. km
in 2023
Malta
4.6 sq. km
in 2023
Aruba rank
205th
Malta rank
204th
Forest area over time
- Aruba
- Malta
How they compare
Malta currently reports 4.6 sq. km against 4.2 sq. km in Aruba, a difference of 0.4 sq. km.
That makes Malta's figure about 1.1 times Aruba's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Aruba ahead.
Aruba ranks 205th and Malta ranks 204th of 213 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Aruba averaged higher in 3 and Malta in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | Malta | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 4.2 sq. km | 3.5 sq. km | 0.7 sq. km | Aruba |
| 2000s | 4.2 sq. km | 3.5 sq. km | 0.7 sq. km | Aruba |
| 2010s | 4.2 sq. km | 3.82 sq. km | 0.38 sq. km | Aruba |
| 2020s | 4.2 sq. km | 4.6 sq. km | 0.4 sq. km | Malta |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest area, Aruba or Malta?
- Malta, at 4.6 sq. km against 4.2 sq. km in Aruba as of 2023.
- What is the difference in forest area between Aruba and Malta?
- 0.4 sq. km, with Malta ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Malta?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Aruba and Malta rank globally for forest area?
- Aruba ranks 205th and Malta ranks 204th of 213 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Forest area (sq. km). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Forest area is land under natural or planted stands of trees of at least 5 meters in situ, whether productive or not, and excludes tree stands in agricultural production systems (for example, in fruit plantations and agroforestry systems) and trees in urban parks and gardens.