What is the difference in forest area (sq. km), per capita between IDA & IBRD total and New Zealand?

0.0147 sq. km per person, with New Zealand ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for IDA & IBRD total and New Zealand?

32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Forest area (sq. km), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

IDA & IBRD total vs New Zealand: Forest area (sq. km), per capita

IDA & IBRD total

0.0044 sq. km per person

in 2023

New Zealand

0.0191 sq. km per person

in 2023

IDA & IBRD total rank

24th

New Zealand rank

27th

Forest area (sq. km), per capita over time

IDA & IBRD total
New Zealand

How they compare

New Zealand currently reports 0.0191 sq. km per person against 0.0044 sq. km per person in IDA & IBRD total, a difference of 0.0147 sq. km per person.

That makes New Zealand's figure about 4.3 times IDA & IBRD total's.

Across all 32 years both countries report, New Zealand has been ahead every year.

IDA & IBRD total ranks 24th and New Zealand ranks 27th of 47 groups.

New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	IDA & IBRD total	New Zealand	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0.0067 sq. km per person	0.0261 sq. km per person	0.0194 sq. km per person	New Zealand
2000s	0.0057 sq. km per person	0.0241 sq. km per person	0.0184 sq. km per person	New Zealand
2010s	0.0049 sq. km per person	0.0214 sq. km per person	0.0165 sq. km per person	New Zealand
2020s	0.0045 sq. km per person	0.0194 sq. km per person	0.0149 sq. km per person	New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher forest area (sq. km), per capita, IDA & IBRD total or New Zealand?: New Zealand, at 0.0191 sq. km per person against 0.0044 sq. km per person in IDA & IBRD total as of 2023.
What is the difference in forest area (sq. km), per capita between IDA & IBRD total and New Zealand?: 0.0147 sq. km per person, with New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for IDA & IBRD total and New Zealand?: 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do IDA & IBRD total and New Zealand rank globally for forest area (sq. km), per capita?: IDA & IBRD total ranks 24th and New Zealand ranks 27th of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Forest area (sq. km), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

IDA & IBRD total vs New Zealand: Forest area (sq. km), per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/forest-area-sq-km-per-capita/ida-and-ibrd-total/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/forest-area-sq-km-per-capita/ida-and-ibrd-total/new-zealand/">IDA & IBRD total vs New Zealand: Forest area (sq. km), per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Forest area (sq. km), per capita
Unit: sq. km per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 262 places, 8,671 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed: 12 October 2026

Forest area (sq. km) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.