What is the difference in forest area (sq. km), per capita between Ecuador and East Timor?

0.0002 sq. km per person, with Ecuador ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and East Timor?

34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Forest area (sq. km), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Ecuador vs East Timor: Forest area (sq. km), per capita

Ecuador

0.0068 sq. km per person

in 2023

East Timor

0.0066 sq. km per person

in 2023

Ecuador rank

54th

East Timor rank

56th

Forest area (sq. km), per capita over time

Ecuador
East Timor

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 0.0068 sq. km per person against 0.0066 sq. km per person in East Timor, a difference of 0.0002 sq. km per person.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Ecuador ahead.

Ecuador ranks 54th and East Timor ranks 56th of 214 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 3 and East Timor in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Ecuador	East Timor	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0.0124 sq. km per person	0.0114 sq. km per person	0.0011 sq. km per person	Ecuador
2000s	0.0098 sq. km per person	0.0102 sq. km per person	0.0005 sq. km per person	East Timor
2010s	0.0079 sq. km per person	0.0078 sq. km per person	0.0001 sq. km per person	Ecuador
2020s	0.007 sq. km per person	0.0068 sq. km per person	0.0002 sq. km per person	Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher forest area (sq. km), per capita, Ecuador or East Timor?: Ecuador, at 0.0068 sq. km per person against 0.0066 sq. km per person in East Timor as of 2023.
What is the difference in forest area (sq. km), per capita between Ecuador and East Timor?: 0.0002 sq. km per person, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and East Timor?: 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and East Timor rank globally for forest area (sq. km), per capita?: Ecuador ranks 54th and East Timor ranks 56th of 214 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Forest area (sq. km), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs East Timor: Forest area (sq. km), per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/forest-area-sq-km-per-capita/ecuador/timor-leste/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/forest-area-sq-km-per-capita/ecuador/timor-leste/">Ecuador vs East Timor: Forest area (sq. km), per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Forest area (sq. km), per capita
Unit: sq. km per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 262 places, 8,671 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed: 12 October 2026

Forest area (sq. km) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.