East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Zimbabwe: Forest area (sq. km), per capita

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
0.0023 sq. km per person
in 2023
Zimbabwe
0.0106 sq. km per person
in 2023
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) rank
38th
Zimbabwe rank
41st

Forest area (sq. km), per capita over time

  • East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
  • Zimbabwe
00.0050.010.0150.02199020062023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 0.0106 sq. km per person against 0.0023 sq. km per person in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income), a difference of 0.0083 sq. km per person.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 4.6 times East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)'s.

Across all 34 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 38th and Zimbabwe ranks 41st of 47 groups.

Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0027 sq. km per person 0.017 sq. km per person 0.0143 sq. km per person Zimbabwe
2000s 0.0025 sq. km per person 0.0146 sq. km per person 0.0121 sq. km per person Zimbabwe
2010s 0.0024 sq. km per person 0.0124 sq. km per person 0.01 sq. km per person Zimbabwe
2020s 0.0023 sq. km per person 0.0109 sq. km per person 0.0086 sq. km per person Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher forest area (sq. km), per capita, East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 0.0106 sq. km per person against 0.0023 sq. km per person in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) as of 2023.
What is the difference in forest area (sq. km), per capita between East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Zimbabwe?
0.0083 sq. km per person, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Zimbabwe?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Zimbabwe rank globally for forest area (sq. km), per capita?
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 38th and Zimbabwe ranks 41st of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Forest area (sq. km), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Zimbabwe: Forest area (sq. km), per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/forest-area-sq-km-per-capita/east-asia-and-pacific-excluding-high-income/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/forest-area-sq-km-per-capita/east-asia-and-pacific-excluding-high-income/zimbabwe/">East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Zimbabwe: Forest area (sq. km), per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Forest area (sq. km), per capita
Unit
sq. km per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
262 places, 8,671 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

Forest area (sq. km) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.