What is the difference in food production index between Iceland and Israel?

0.51 2014-2016 = 100, with Israel ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Israel?

64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

FAO electronic files and web site, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), publisher: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Food production index (2014-2016 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Iceland vs Israel: Food production index (2014-2016 = 100)

Iceland

102.9 2014-2016 = 100

in 2024

Israel

103.41 2014-2016 = 100

in 2024

Iceland rank

121st

Israel rank

119th

Food production index (2014-2016 = 100) over time

Iceland
Israel

How they compare

Israel currently reports 103.41 2014-2016 = 100 against 102.9 2014-2016 = 100 in Iceland, a difference of 0.51 2014-2016 = 100.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Iceland ahead.

Iceland ranks 121st and Israel ranks 119th of 195 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Iceland averaged higher in 5 and Israel in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Iceland	Israel	Difference	Ahead
1960s	77.26 2014-2016 = 100	28.11 2014-2016 = 100	49.15 2014-2016 = 100	Iceland
1970s	84.42 2014-2016 = 100	44.97 2014-2016 = 100	39.45 2014-2016 = 100	Iceland
1980s	84.39 2014-2016 = 100	54.81 2014-2016 = 100	29.58 2014-2016 = 100	Iceland
1990s	71.18 2014-2016 = 100	64.98 2014-2016 = 100	6.2 2014-2016 = 100	Iceland
2000s	82.68 2014-2016 = 100	84.35 2014-2016 = 100	1.68 2014-2016 = 100	Israel
2010s	99.01 2014-2016 = 100	97.79 2014-2016 = 100	1.22 2014-2016 = 100	Iceland
2020s	103.49 2014-2016 = 100	104.15 2014-2016 = 100	0.662 2014-2016 = 100	Israel

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher food production index, Iceland or Israel?: Israel, at 103.41 2014-2016 = 100 against 102.9 2014-2016 = 100 in Iceland as of 2024.
What is the difference in food production index between Iceland and Israel?: 0.51 2014-2016 = 100, with Israel ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Israel?: 64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Iceland and Israel rank globally for food production index?: Iceland ranks 121st and Israel ranks 119th of 195 countries.
Where does this data come from?: FAO electronic files and web site, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), publisher: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Food production index (2014-2016 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Iceland vs Israel: Food production index. Statizoid, drawing on FAO electronic files and web site, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), publisher: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Retrieved 12 November 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/food-production-index-2014-2016-100/iceland/israel/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/food-production-index-2014-2016-100/iceland/israel/">Iceland vs Israel: Food production index</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Food production index (2014-2016 = 100)
Unit: 2014-2016 = 100
Source: FAO electronic files and web site, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), publisher: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 242 places, 14,280 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 12 November 2026

Food production index covers food crops that are considered edible and that contain nutrients. Coffee and tea are excluded because, although edible, they have no nutritive value.