Guatemala vs Sudan: Food production index (2014-2016 = 100)
Guatemala
104.2 2014-2016 = 100
in 2024
Sudan
103.98 2014-2016 = 100
in 2024
Guatemala rank
116th
Sudan rank
118th
Food production index (2014-2016 = 100) over time
- Guatemala
- Sudan
How they compare
Guatemala currently reports 104.2 2014-2016 = 100 against 103.98 2014-2016 = 100 in Sudan, a difference of 0.22 2014-2016 = 100.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Guatemala ahead.
Guatemala ranks 116th and Sudan ranks 118th of 195 countries.
Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guatemala | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 97.09 2014-2016 = 100 | 101.06 2014-2016 = 100 | 3.97 2014-2016 = 100 | Sudan |
| 2020s | 107.27 2014-2016 = 100 | 107.61 2014-2016 = 100 | 0.34 2014-2016 = 100 | Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher food production index, Guatemala or Sudan?
- Guatemala, at 104.2 2014-2016 = 100 against 103.98 2014-2016 = 100 in Sudan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in food production index between Guatemala and Sudan?
- 0.22 2014-2016 = 100, with Guatemala ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Sudan?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2024.
- How do Guatemala and Sudan rank globally for food production index?
- Guatemala ranks 116th and Sudan ranks 118th of 195 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- FAO electronic files and web site, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), publisher: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Food production index (2014-2016 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Food production index covers food crops that are considered edible and that contain nutrients. Coffee and tea are excluded because, although edible, they have no nutritive value.