What is the difference in food production index between Djibouti and Kuwait?

2.13 2014-2016 = 100, with Djibouti ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Djibouti and Kuwait?

62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.

Where does this data come from?

FAO electronic files and web site, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), publisher: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Food production index (2014-2016 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Djibouti vs Kuwait: Food production index

Djibouti

133 2014-2016 = 100

in 2022

Kuwait

130.87 2014-2016 = 100

in 2022

Djibouti rank

17th

Kuwait rank

20th

Food production index over time

Djibouti
Kuwait

How they compare

Djibouti currently reports 133 2014-2016 = 100 against 130.87 2014-2016 = 100 in Kuwait, a difference of 2.13 2014-2016 = 100.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 62 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Djibouti ahead.

Djibouti ranks 17th and Kuwait ranks 20th of 195 countries.

Djibouti has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Djibouti	Kuwait	Difference	Ahead
1960s	28.26 2014-2016 = 100	5.04 2014-2016 = 100	23.22 2014-2016 = 100	Djibouti
1970s	41.56 2014-2016 = 100	7.38 2014-2016 = 100	34.18 2014-2016 = 100	Djibouti
1980s	63.29 2014-2016 = 100	18.42 2014-2016 = 100	44.87 2014-2016 = 100	Djibouti
1990s	90.17 2014-2016 = 100	22.36 2014-2016 = 100	67.81 2014-2016 = 100	Djibouti
2000s	110.64 2014-2016 = 100	46.66 2014-2016 = 100	63.98 2014-2016 = 100	Djibouti
2010s	117.78 2014-2016 = 100	98.89 2014-2016 = 100	18.88 2014-2016 = 100	Djibouti
2020s	136.06 2014-2016 = 100	116.09 2014-2016 = 100	19.97 2014-2016 = 100	Djibouti

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher food production index, Djibouti or Kuwait?: Djibouti, at 133 2014-2016 = 100 against 130.87 2014-2016 = 100 in Kuwait as of 2022.
What is the difference in food production index between Djibouti and Kuwait?: 2.13 2014-2016 = 100, with Djibouti ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Djibouti and Kuwait?: 62 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2022.
How do Djibouti and Kuwait rank globally for food production index?: Djibouti ranks 17th and Kuwait ranks 20th of 195 countries.
Where does this data come from?: FAO electronic files and web site, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), publisher: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), published as Food production index (2014-2016 = 100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Djibouti vs Kuwait: Food production index. Statizoid, drawing on FAO electronic files and web site, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), publisher: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/food-production-index-2014-2016-100/djibouti/kuwait/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/food-production-index-2014-2016-100/djibouti/kuwait/">Djibouti vs Kuwait: Food production index</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Food production index (2014-2016 = 100)
Unit: 2014-2016 = 100
Source: FAO electronic files and web site, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), publisher: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 242 places, 13,707 data points, 1961–2022
Last refreshed: 01 October 2026

Food production index covers food crops that are considered edible and that contain nutrients. Coffee and tea are excluded because, although edible, they have no nutritive value.