How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Bangladesh?

45 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Angola vs Bangladesh: Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per

Angola

0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Bangladesh

0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Angola rank

53rd

Bangladesh rank

56th

Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per over time

Angola
Bangladesh

How they compare

Angola currently reports 0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP against 0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in Bangladesh, a difference of 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 45 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Bangladesh ahead.

Angola ranks 53rd and Bangladesh ranks 56th of 140 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Angola averaged higher in 1 and Bangladesh in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Angola	Bangladesh	Difference	Ahead
1980s	0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0.0004 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0.0003 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Bangladesh
1990s	0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0.0003 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Bangladesh
2000s	0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0.0002 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Bangladesh
2010s	0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Bangladesh
2020s	0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Angola

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$), per, Angola or Bangladesh?: Angola, at 0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP against 0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in Bangladesh as of 2024.
What is the difference in food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$), per between Angola and Bangladesh?: 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP, with Angola ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Bangladesh?: 45 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2024.
How do Angola and Bangladesh rank globally for food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$), per?: Angola ranks 53rd and Bangladesh ranks 56th of 140 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Angola vs Bangladesh: Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/food-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-unit-of-gdp/angola/bangladesh/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/food-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-unit-of-gdp/angola/bangladesh/">Angola vs Bangladesh: Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP
Unit: 1000 USD per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 141 places, 7,599 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 24 September 2026

Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.