Pakistan vs Portugal: Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per

Pakistan
96.98 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Portugal
88.78 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Pakistan rank
31st
Portugal rank
34th

Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per over time

  • Pakistan
  • Portugal
020406080100196119922023

How they compare

Pakistan currently reports 96.98 1000 USD per square kilometre against 88.78 1000 USD per square kilometre in Portugal, a difference of 8.2 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Pakistan's figure about 1.1 times Portugal's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Portugal ahead.

Pakistan ranks 31st and Portugal ranks 34th of 140 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Pakistan averaged higher in 1 and Portugal in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Pakistan Portugal Difference Ahead
1960s 11.01 1000 USD per square kilometre 61.48 1000 USD per square kilometre 50.47 1000 USD per square kilometre Portugal
1970s 16.11 1000 USD per square kilometre 62.2 1000 USD per square kilometre 46.09 1000 USD per square kilometre Portugal
1980s 23.14 1000 USD per square kilometre 64.1 1000 USD per square kilometre 40.96 1000 USD per square kilometre Portugal
1990s 36.05 1000 USD per square kilometre 73.03 1000 USD per square kilometre 36.97 1000 USD per square kilometre Portugal
2000s 49.34 1000 USD per square kilometre 73.91 1000 USD per square kilometre 24.57 1000 USD per square kilometre Portugal
2010s 71.24 1000 USD per square kilometre 76.52 1000 USD per square kilometre 5.28 1000 USD per square kilometre Portugal
2020s 90.88 1000 USD per square kilometre 87.24 1000 USD per square kilometre 3.65 1000 USD per square kilometre Pakistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$), per, Pakistan or Portugal?
Pakistan, at 96.98 1000 USD per square kilometre against 88.78 1000 USD per square kilometre in Portugal as of 2023.
What is the difference in food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$), per between Pakistan and Portugal?
8.2 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Pakistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Pakistan and Portugal?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Pakistan and Portugal rank globally for food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$), per?
Pakistan ranks 31st and Portugal ranks 34th of 140 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Pakistan vs Portugal: Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/food-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/pakistan/portugal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/food-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/pakistan/portugal/">Pakistan vs Portugal: Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
141 places, 7,942 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.