Namibia vs Oman: Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per

Namibia
0.4202 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Oman
1.32 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Namibia rank
139th
Oman rank
136th

Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per over time

  • Namibia
  • Oman
00.250.50.7511.2196119922023

How they compare

Oman currently reports 1.32 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.4202 1000 USD per square kilometre in Namibia, a difference of 0.8998 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Oman's figure about 3.1 times Namibia's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Namibia ahead.

Namibia ranks 139th and Oman ranks 136th of 140 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Namibia averaged higher in 3 and Oman in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Namibia Oman Difference Ahead
1960s 0.1815 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0819 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0997 1000 USD per square kilometre Namibia
1970s 0.2053 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1085 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0968 1000 USD per square kilometre Namibia
1980s 0.2236 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.236 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0124 1000 USD per square kilometre Oman
1990s 0.2583 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.3234 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0651 1000 USD per square kilometre Oman
2000s 0.3427 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.3212 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0215 1000 USD per square kilometre Namibia
2010s 0.3747 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.6076 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.233 1000 USD per square kilometre Oman
2020s 0.403 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.23 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.8308 1000 USD per square kilometre Oman

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$), per, Namibia or Oman?
Oman, at 1.32 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.4202 1000 USD per square kilometre in Namibia as of 2023.
What is the difference in food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$), per between Namibia and Oman?
0.8998 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Oman ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Oman?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Namibia and Oman rank globally for food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$), per?
Namibia ranks 139th and Oman ranks 136th of 140 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Namibia vs Oman: Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/food-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/namibia/oman/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/food-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/namibia/oman/">Namibia vs Oman: Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
141 places, 7,942 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.