Mongolia vs Namibia: Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per

Mongolia
1.03 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Namibia
0.4202 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Mongolia rank
138th
Namibia rank
139th

Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per over time

  • Mongolia
  • Namibia
0.20.40.60.811.2196119922023

How they compare

Mongolia currently reports 1.03 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.4202 1000 USD per square kilometre in Namibia, a difference of 0.6098 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Mongolia's figure about 2.5 times Namibia's.

Across all 61 years both countries report, Mongolia has been ahead every year.

Mongolia ranks 138th and Namibia ranks 139th of 140 countries.

Mongolia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mongolia Namibia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.328 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1815 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1465 1000 USD per square kilometre Mongolia
1970s 0.4225 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2053 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2172 1000 USD per square kilometre Mongolia
1980s 0.5505 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2236 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.3269 1000 USD per square kilometre Mongolia
1990s 0.5274 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2598 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2677 1000 USD per square kilometre Mongolia
2000s 0.481 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.3427 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1383 1000 USD per square kilometre Mongolia
2010s 0.6444 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.3747 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2697 1000 USD per square kilometre Mongolia
2020s 1.01 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.403 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.6041 1000 USD per square kilometre Mongolia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$), per, Mongolia or Namibia?
Mongolia, at 1.03 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.4202 1000 USD per square kilometre in Namibia as of 2023.
What is the difference in food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$), per between Mongolia and Namibia?
0.6098 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Mongolia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Namibia?
61 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Mongolia and Namibia rank globally for food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$), per?
Mongolia ranks 138th and Namibia ranks 139th of 140 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mongolia vs Namibia: Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/food-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/mongolia/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/food-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/mongolia/namibia/">Mongolia vs Namibia: Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
141 places, 7,942 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.