China vs Germany: Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per

China
147.97 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Germany
130.66 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
China rank
17th
Germany rank
19th

Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per over time

  • China
  • Germany
050100150196119922023

How they compare

China currently reports 147.97 1000 USD per square kilometre against 130.66 1000 USD per square kilometre in Germany, a difference of 17.31 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes China's figure about 1.1 times Germany's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Germany ahead.

China ranks 17th and Germany ranks 19th of 140 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, China averaged higher in 1 and Germany in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Germany Difference Ahead
1960s 17.88 1000 USD per square kilometre 115.97 1000 USD per square kilometre 98.09 1000 USD per square kilometre Germany
1970s 24.77 1000 USD per square kilometre 128.27 1000 USD per square kilometre 103.5 1000 USD per square kilometre Germany
1980s 37.41 1000 USD per square kilometre 142.84 1000 USD per square kilometre 105.43 1000 USD per square kilometre Germany
1990s 63.36 1000 USD per square kilometre 126.68 1000 USD per square kilometre 63.32 1000 USD per square kilometre Germany
2000s 94.7 1000 USD per square kilometre 131.63 1000 USD per square kilometre 36.93 1000 USD per square kilometre Germany
2010s 126.53 1000 USD per square kilometre 137.12 1000 USD per square kilometre 10.6 1000 USD per square kilometre Germany
2020s 142.46 1000 USD per square kilometre 132.24 1000 USD per square kilometre 10.22 1000 USD per square kilometre China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$), per, China or Germany?
China, at 147.97 1000 USD per square kilometre against 130.66 1000 USD per square kilometre in Germany as of 2023.
What is the difference in food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$), per between China and Germany?
17.31 1000 USD per square kilometre, with China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Germany?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do China and Germany rank globally for food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$), per?
China ranks 17th and Germany ranks 19th of 140 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Germany: Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 25 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/food-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/china/germany/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/food-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/china/germany/">China vs Germany: Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
141 places, 7,942 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.