How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Kazakhstan?

25 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Chad vs Kazakhstan: Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per

Chad

4.17 1000 USD per square kilometre

in 2023

Kazakhstan

4.06 1000 USD per square kilometre

in 2023

Chad rank

130th

Kazakhstan rank

131st

Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per over time

Chad
Kazakhstan

How they compare

Chad currently reports 4.17 1000 USD per square kilometre against 4.06 1000 USD per square kilometre in Kazakhstan, a difference of 0.11 1000 USD per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 25 shared years of data; in 1999 it was Kazakhstan ahead.

Chad ranks 130th and Kazakhstan ranks 131st of 140 countries.

Kazakhstan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Chad	Kazakhstan	Difference	Ahead
1990s	1.66 1000 USD per square kilometre	2.44 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.7793 1000 USD per square kilometre	Kazakhstan
2000s	2 1000 USD per square kilometre	2.97 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.9692 1000 USD per square kilometre	Kazakhstan
2010s	3.42 1000 USD per square kilometre	3.57 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.1485 1000 USD per square kilometre	Kazakhstan
2020s	4.05 1000 USD per square kilometre	4.1 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.0531 1000 USD per square kilometre	Kazakhstan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$), per, Chad or Kazakhstan?: Chad, at 4.17 1000 USD per square kilometre against 4.06 1000 USD per square kilometre in Kazakhstan as of 2023.
What is the difference in food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$), per between Chad and Kazakhstan?: 0.11 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Chad ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Kazakhstan?: 25 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2023.
How do Chad and Kazakhstan rank globally for food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$), per?: Chad ranks 130th and Kazakhstan ranks 131st of 140 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chad vs Kazakhstan: Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/food-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/chad/kazakhstan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/food-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/chad/kazakhstan/">Chad vs Kazakhstan: Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit: 1000 USD per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 141 places, 7,942 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 24 September 2026

Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.