Botswana vs Suriname: Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per

Botswana
0.0737 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Suriname
1.09 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Botswana rank
140th
Suriname rank
137th

Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per over time

  • Botswana
  • Suriname
00.511.5196119922023

How they compare

Suriname currently reports 1.09 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.0737 1000 USD per square kilometre in Botswana, a difference of 1.02 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Suriname's figure about 14.8 times Botswana's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Suriname has been ahead every year.

Botswana ranks 140th and Suriname ranks 137th of 140 countries.

Suriname has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Suriname Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0713 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.6168 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.5454 1000 USD per square kilometre Suriname
1970s 0.1021 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.7549 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.6528 1000 USD per square kilometre Suriname
1980s 0.0923 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.05 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.9557 1000 USD per square kilometre Suriname
1990s 0.0503 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.19 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.14 1000 USD per square kilometre Suriname
2000s 0.0406 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.09 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.05 1000 USD per square kilometre Suriname
2010s 0.0526 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.45 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.4 1000 USD per square kilometre Suriname
2020s 0.1347 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.22 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.08 1000 USD per square kilometre Suriname

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$), per, Botswana or Suriname?
Suriname, at 1.09 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.0737 1000 USD per square kilometre in Botswana as of 2023.
What is the difference in food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$), per between Botswana and Suriname?
1.02 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Suriname ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Suriname?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Botswana and Suriname rank globally for food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$), per?
Botswana ranks 140th and Suriname ranks 137th of 140 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Suriname: Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/food-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/botswana/suriname/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/food-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/botswana/suriname/">Botswana vs Suriname: Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
141 places, 7,942 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.