Bhutan vs New Caledonia: Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per

Bhutan
5.63 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
New Caledonia
5.49 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Bhutan rank
124th
New Caledonia rank
125th

Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per over time

  • Bhutan
  • New Caledonia
46810196119922023

How they compare

Bhutan currently reports 5.63 1000 USD per square kilometre against 5.49 1000 USD per square kilometre in New Caledonia, a difference of 0.14 1000 USD per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was New Caledonia ahead.

Bhutan ranks 124th and New Caledonia ranks 125th of 140 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Bhutan averaged higher in 4 and New Caledonia in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bhutan New Caledonia Difference Ahead
1960s 3.61 1000 USD per square kilometre 8.01 1000 USD per square kilometre 4.4 1000 USD per square kilometre New Caledonia
1970s 4.46 1000 USD per square kilometre 7.02 1000 USD per square kilometre 2.57 1000 USD per square kilometre New Caledonia
1980s 5.92 1000 USD per square kilometre 8.12 1000 USD per square kilometre 2.2 1000 USD per square kilometre New Caledonia
1990s 6.94 1000 USD per square kilometre 5.79 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.16 1000 USD per square kilometre Bhutan
2000s 6.75 1000 USD per square kilometre 4.36 1000 USD per square kilometre 2.39 1000 USD per square kilometre Bhutan
2010s 8.05 1000 USD per square kilometre 5.13 1000 USD per square kilometre 2.93 1000 USD per square kilometre Bhutan
2020s 6.62 1000 USD per square kilometre 5.62 1000 USD per square kilometre 1 1000 USD per square kilometre Bhutan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$), per, Bhutan or New Caledonia?
Bhutan, at 5.63 1000 USD per square kilometre against 5.49 1000 USD per square kilometre in New Caledonia as of 2023.
What is the difference in food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$), per between Bhutan and New Caledonia?
0.14 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Bhutan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and New Caledonia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Bhutan and New Caledonia rank globally for food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$), per?
Bhutan ranks 124th and New Caledonia ranks 125th of 140 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bhutan vs New Caledonia: Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/food-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/bhutan/new-caledonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/food-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/bhutan/new-caledonia/">Bhutan vs New Caledonia: Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
141 places, 7,942 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.