Barbados vs World: Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per

Barbados
332.54 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
World
33.66 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Barbados rank
2nd
World rank
1st

Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per over time

  • Barbados
  • World
0100200300400196119922023

How they compare

Barbados currently reports 332.54 1000 USD per square kilometre against 33.66 1000 USD per square kilometre in World, a difference of 298.88 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Barbados's figure about 9.9 times World's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Barbados has been ahead every year.

Barbados ranks 2nd and World ranks 1st of 140 countries.

Barbados has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Barbados World Difference Ahead
1960s 343 1000 USD per square kilometre 10.69 1000 USD per square kilometre 332.31 1000 USD per square kilometre Barbados
1970s 349.31 1000 USD per square kilometre 13.26 1000 USD per square kilometre 336.05 1000 USD per square kilometre Barbados
1980s 352.35 1000 USD per square kilometre 16.75 1000 USD per square kilometre 335.6 1000 USD per square kilometre Barbados
1990s 332.6 1000 USD per square kilometre 20.35 1000 USD per square kilometre 312.25 1000 USD per square kilometre Barbados
2000s 315.23 1000 USD per square kilometre 25.41 1000 USD per square kilometre 289.83 1000 USD per square kilometre Barbados
2010s 316.77 1000 USD per square kilometre 30.18 1000 USD per square kilometre 286.59 1000 USD per square kilometre Barbados
2020s 316.34 1000 USD per square kilometre 32.82 1000 USD per square kilometre 283.51 1000 USD per square kilometre Barbados

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$), per, Barbados or World?
Barbados, at 332.54 1000 USD per square kilometre against 33.66 1000 USD per square kilometre in World as of 2023.
What is the difference in food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$), per between Barbados and World?
298.88 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Barbados ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and World?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Barbados and World rank globally for food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$), per?
Barbados ranks 2nd and World ranks 1st of 140 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Barbados vs World: Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/food-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/barbados/world/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/food-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/barbados/world/">Barbados vs World: Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
141 places, 7,942 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.