Australia vs Madagascar: Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per

Australia
5.08 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Madagascar
5.13 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Australia rank
128th
Madagascar rank
127th

Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per over time

  • Australia
  • Madagascar
123456196119922023

How they compare

Madagascar currently reports 5.13 1000 USD per square kilometre against 5.08 1000 USD per square kilometre in Australia, a difference of 0.05 1000 USD per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Madagascar ahead.

Australia ranks 128th and Madagascar ranks 127th of 140 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 1 and Madagascar in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Madagascar Difference Ahead
1960s 1.67 1000 USD per square kilometre 3.32 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.65 1000 USD per square kilometre Madagascar
1970s 2.15 1000 USD per square kilometre 4.06 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.91 1000 USD per square kilometre Madagascar
1980s 2.4 1000 USD per square kilometre 4.72 1000 USD per square kilometre 2.32 1000 USD per square kilometre Madagascar
1990s 3.03 1000 USD per square kilometre 3.4 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.3686 1000 USD per square kilometre Madagascar
2000s 3.64 1000 USD per square kilometre 3.79 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1484 1000 USD per square kilometre Madagascar
2010s 4.2 1000 USD per square kilometre 4.57 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.3705 1000 USD per square kilometre Madagascar
2020s 5.2 1000 USD per square kilometre 4.85 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.344 1000 USD per square kilometre Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$), per, Australia or Madagascar?
Madagascar, at 5.13 1000 USD per square kilometre against 5.08 1000 USD per square kilometre in Australia as of 2023.
What is the difference in food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$), per between Australia and Madagascar?
0.05 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Madagascar ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Madagascar?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Australia and Madagascar rank globally for food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$), per?
Australia ranks 128th and Madagascar ranks 127th of 140 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Madagascar: Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/food-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/australia/madagascar/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/food-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/australia/madagascar/">Australia vs Madagascar: Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
141 places, 7,942 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.