Romania vs South Africa: Food: Gross Production Value (constant) … square kilometre SLC

Romania
227.91 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
South Africa
234.51 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Romania rank
82nd
South Africa rank
80th

Food: Gross Production Value (constant) … square kilometre SLC over time

  • Romania
  • South Africa
100200300400196119922023

How they compare

South Africa currently reports 234.51 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 227.91 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Romania, a difference of 6.6 1000 SLC per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 61 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Romania ahead.

Romania ranks 82nd and South Africa ranks 80th of 142 countries.

Romania has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Romania South Africa Difference Ahead
1960s 189.82 1000 SLC per square kilometre 70.8 1000 SLC per square kilometre 119.02 1000 SLC per square kilometre Romania
1970s 264.77 1000 SLC per square kilometre 94.12 1000 SLC per square kilometre 170.65 1000 SLC per square kilometre Romania
1980s 328.58 1000 SLC per square kilometre 111.54 1000 SLC per square kilometre 217.04 1000 SLC per square kilometre Romania
1990s 268.94 1000 SLC per square kilometre 126.64 1000 SLC per square kilometre 142.3 1000 SLC per square kilometre Romania
2000s 260.83 1000 SLC per square kilometre 154.23 1000 SLC per square kilometre 106.59 1000 SLC per square kilometre Romania
2010s 273.04 1000 SLC per square kilometre 197.71 1000 SLC per square kilometre 75.33 1000 SLC per square kilometre Romania
2020s 236.11 1000 SLC per square kilometre 232.33 1000 SLC per square kilometre 3.78 1000 SLC per square kilometre Romania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand slc), per, Romania or South Africa?
South Africa, at 234.51 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 227.91 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Romania as of 2023.
What is the difference in food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand slc), per between Romania and South Africa?
6.6 1000 SLC per square kilometre, with South Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Romania and South Africa?
61 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Romania and South Africa rank globally for food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand slc), per?
Romania ranks 82nd and South Africa ranks 80th of 142 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Romania vs South Africa: Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/food-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square-kilometre/romania/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/food-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square-kilometre/romania/south-africa/">Romania vs South Africa: Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
142 places, 8,031 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.