Puerto Rico vs Zambia: Food: Gross Production Value (constant) … square kilometre SLC

Puerto Rico
66.08 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Zambia
68.53 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Puerto Rico rank
112th
Zambia rank
110th

Food: Gross Production Value (constant) … square kilometre SLC over time

  • Puerto Rico
  • Zambia
050100150196119922023

How they compare

Zambia currently reports 68.53 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 66.08 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Puerto Rico, a difference of 2.45 1000 SLC per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 49 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Puerto Rico ahead.

Puerto Rico ranks 112th and Zambia ranks 110th of 142 countries.

Puerto Rico has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Puerto Rico Zambia Difference Ahead
1960s 140.97 1000 SLC per square kilometre 6.06 1000 SLC per square kilometre 134.91 1000 SLC per square kilometre Puerto Rico
1970s 128.49 1000 SLC per square kilometre 8.76 1000 SLC per square kilometre 119.73 1000 SLC per square kilometre Puerto Rico
1980s 125.12 1000 SLC per square kilometre 10.07 1000 SLC per square kilometre 115.05 1000 SLC per square kilometre Puerto Rico
1990s 123.23 1000 SLC per square kilometre 13.51 1000 SLC per square kilometre 109.72 1000 SLC per square kilometre Puerto Rico
2000s 82.43 1000 SLC per square kilometre 25.1 1000 SLC per square kilometre 57.32 1000 SLC per square kilometre Puerto Rico
2010s 71.3 1000 SLC per square kilometre 42.18 1000 SLC per square kilometre 29.13 1000 SLC per square kilometre Puerto Rico
2020s 67.27 1000 SLC per square kilometre 60.2 1000 SLC per square kilometre 7.07 1000 SLC per square kilometre Puerto Rico

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand slc), per, Puerto Rico or Zambia?
Zambia, at 68.53 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 66.08 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Puerto Rico as of 2023.
What is the difference in food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand slc), per between Puerto Rico and Zambia?
2.45 1000 SLC per square kilometre, with Zambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Puerto Rico and Zambia?
49 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Puerto Rico and Zambia rank globally for food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand slc), per?
Puerto Rico ranks 112th and Zambia ranks 110th of 142 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Puerto Rico vs Zambia: Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/food-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square-kilometre/puerto-rico-us/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/food-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square-kilometre/puerto-rico-us/zambia/">Puerto Rico vs Zambia: Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
142 places, 8,031 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.