New Zealand vs Samoa: Food: Gross Production Value (constant) … square kilometre SLC

New Zealand
78.73 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Samoa
75.06 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
New Zealand rank
102nd
Samoa rank
104th

Food: Gross Production Value (constant) … square kilometre SLC over time

  • New Zealand
  • Samoa
255075100125196119922023

How they compare

New Zealand currently reports 78.73 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 75.06 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Samoa, a difference of 3.67 1000 SLC per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Samoa ahead.

New Zealand ranks 102nd and Samoa ranks 104th of 142 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, New Zealand averaged higher in 1 and Samoa in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade New Zealand Samoa Difference Ahead
1960s 28.19 1000 SLC per square kilometre 95.35 1000 SLC per square kilometre 67.17 1000 SLC per square kilometre Samoa
1970s 33.64 1000 SLC per square kilometre 107.36 1000 SLC per square kilometre 73.73 1000 SLC per square kilometre Samoa
1980s 40.47 1000 SLC per square kilometre 118.96 1000 SLC per square kilometre 78.49 1000 SLC per square kilometre Samoa
1990s 47.44 1000 SLC per square kilometre 74.06 1000 SLC per square kilometre 26.62 1000 SLC per square kilometre Samoa
2000s 60.7 1000 SLC per square kilometre 92.8 1000 SLC per square kilometre 32.11 1000 SLC per square kilometre Samoa
2010s 73.35 1000 SLC per square kilometre 94.34 1000 SLC per square kilometre 21 1000 SLC per square kilometre Samoa
2020s 79.26 1000 SLC per square kilometre 75 1000 SLC per square kilometre 4.26 1000 SLC per square kilometre New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand slc), per, New Zealand or Samoa?
New Zealand, at 78.73 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 75.06 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Samoa as of 2023.
What is the difference in food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand slc), per between New Zealand and Samoa?
3.67 1000 SLC per square kilometre, with New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Samoa?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do New Zealand and Samoa rank globally for food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand slc), per?
New Zealand ranks 102nd and Samoa ranks 104th of 142 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

New Zealand vs Samoa: Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/food-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square-kilometre/new-zealand/samoa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/food-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square-kilometre/new-zealand/samoa/">New Zealand vs Samoa: Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
142 places, 8,031 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.