Nepal vs Pakistan: Food: Gross Production Value (constant) … square kilometre SLC

Nepal
7,233 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Pakistan
9,978 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Nepal rank
31st
Pakistan rank
28th

Food: Gross Production Value (constant) … square kilometre SLC over time

  • Nepal
  • Pakistan
02.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k10.0k196119922023

How they compare

Pakistan currently reports 9,978 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 7,233 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Nepal, a difference of 2,745 1000 SLC per square kilometre.

That makes Pakistan's figure about 1.4 times Nepal's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Nepal ahead.

Nepal ranks 31st and Pakistan ranks 28th of 142 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Nepal averaged higher in 1 and Pakistan in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Nepal Pakistan Difference Ahead
1960s 1,228 1000 SLC per square kilometre 1,133 1000 SLC per square kilometre 95.07 1000 SLC per square kilometre Nepal
1970s 1,489 1000 SLC per square kilometre 1,657 1000 SLC per square kilometre 168.18 1000 SLC per square kilometre Pakistan
1980s 2,054 1000 SLC per square kilometre 2,381 1000 SLC per square kilometre 326.17 1000 SLC per square kilometre Pakistan
1990s 2,938 1000 SLC per square kilometre 3,709 1000 SLC per square kilometre 770.98 1000 SLC per square kilometre Pakistan
2000s 4,037 1000 SLC per square kilometre 5,076 1000 SLC per square kilometre 1,039 1000 SLC per square kilometre Pakistan
2010s 5,808 1000 SLC per square kilometre 7,330 1000 SLC per square kilometre 1,522 1000 SLC per square kilometre Pakistan
2020s 7,253 1000 SLC per square kilometre 9,351 1000 SLC per square kilometre 2,098 1000 SLC per square kilometre Pakistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand slc), per, Nepal or Pakistan?
Pakistan, at 9,978 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 7,233 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Nepal as of 2023.
What is the difference in food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand slc), per between Nepal and Pakistan?
2,745 1000 SLC per square kilometre, with Pakistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Nepal and Pakistan?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Nepal and Pakistan rank globally for food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand slc), per?
Nepal ranks 31st and Pakistan ranks 28th of 142 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Nepal vs Pakistan: Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/food-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square-kilometre/nepal/pakistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/food-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square-kilometre/nepal/pakistan/">Nepal vs Pakistan: Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
142 places, 8,031 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.