Malawi vs Paraguay: Food: Gross Production Value (constant) … square kilometre SLC

Malawi
68,913 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Paraguay
107,326 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Malawi rank
8th
Paraguay rank
6th

Food: Gross Production Value (constant) … square kilometre SLC over time

  • Malawi
  • Paraguay
025.0k50.0k75.0k100.0k125.0k196119922023

How they compare

Paraguay currently reports 107,326 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 68,913 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Malawi, a difference of 38,413 1000 SLC per square kilometre.

That makes Paraguay's figure about 1.6 times Malawi's.

Across all 58 years both countries report, Paraguay has been ahead every year.

Malawi ranks 8th and Paraguay ranks 6th of 142 countries.

Paraguay has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malawi Paraguay Difference Ahead
1960s 4,359 1000 SLC per square kilometre 13,308 1000 SLC per square kilometre 8,949 1000 SLC per square kilometre Paraguay
1970s 6,788 1000 SLC per square kilometre 17,705 1000 SLC per square kilometre 10,917 1000 SLC per square kilometre Paraguay
1980s 8,006 1000 SLC per square kilometre 26,989 1000 SLC per square kilometre 18,983 1000 SLC per square kilometre Paraguay
1990s 12,598 1000 SLC per square kilometre 43,297 1000 SLC per square kilometre 30,699 1000 SLC per square kilometre Paraguay
2000s 23,860 1000 SLC per square kilometre 57,419 1000 SLC per square kilometre 33,559 1000 SLC per square kilometre Paraguay
2010s 47,617 1000 SLC per square kilometre 96,385 1000 SLC per square kilometre 48,768 1000 SLC per square kilometre Paraguay
2020s 66,861 1000 SLC per square kilometre 105,679 1000 SLC per square kilometre 38,818 1000 SLC per square kilometre Paraguay

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand slc), per, Malawi or Paraguay?
Paraguay, at 107,326 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 68,913 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Malawi as of 2023.
What is the difference in food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand slc), per between Malawi and Paraguay?
38,413 1000 SLC per square kilometre, with Paraguay ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Paraguay?
58 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Malawi and Paraguay rank globally for food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand slc), per?
Malawi ranks 8th and Paraguay ranks 6th of 142 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malawi vs Paraguay: Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/food-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square-kilometre/malawi/paraguay/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/food-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square-kilometre/malawi/paraguay/">Malawi vs Paraguay: Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
142 places, 8,031 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.