Cuba vs El Salvador: Food: Gross Production Value (constant) … square kilometre SLC

Cuba
95.55 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
El Salvador
89.03 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Cuba rank
99th
El Salvador rank
101st

Food: Gross Production Value (constant) … square kilometre SLC over time

  • Cuba
  • El Salvador
50100150200250196119922023

How they compare

Cuba currently reports 95.55 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 89.03 1000 SLC per square kilometre in El Salvador, a difference of 6.52 1000 SLC per square kilometre.

That makes Cuba's figure about 1.1 times El Salvador's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Cuba has been ahead every year.

Cuba ranks 99th and El Salvador ranks 101st of 142 countries.

Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cuba El Salvador Difference Ahead
1960s 89.15 1000 SLC per square kilometre 47.21 1000 SLC per square kilometre 41.94 1000 SLC per square kilometre Cuba
1970s 113.63 1000 SLC per square kilometre 65.26 1000 SLC per square kilometre 48.37 1000 SLC per square kilometre Cuba
1980s 140.84 1000 SLC per square kilometre 72.9 1000 SLC per square kilometre 67.94 1000 SLC per square kilometre Cuba
1990s 126.38 1000 SLC per square kilometre 84.35 1000 SLC per square kilometre 42.03 1000 SLC per square kilometre Cuba
2000s 214.36 1000 SLC per square kilometre 90.39 1000 SLC per square kilometre 123.97 1000 SLC per square kilometre Cuba
2010s 229.25 1000 SLC per square kilometre 91.19 1000 SLC per square kilometre 138.06 1000 SLC per square kilometre Cuba
2020s 140.37 1000 SLC per square kilometre 89.64 1000 SLC per square kilometre 50.74 1000 SLC per square kilometre Cuba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand slc), per, Cuba or El Salvador?
Cuba, at 95.55 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 89.03 1000 SLC per square kilometre in El Salvador as of 2023.
What is the difference in food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand slc), per between Cuba and El Salvador?
6.52 1000 SLC per square kilometre, with Cuba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and El Salvador?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Cuba and El Salvador rank globally for food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand slc), per?
Cuba ranks 99th and El Salvador ranks 101st of 142 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cuba vs El Salvador: Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/food-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square-kilometre/cuba/el-salvador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/food-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square-kilometre/cuba/el-salvador/">Cuba vs El Salvador: Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
142 places, 8,031 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.