Congo vs Mauritius: Food: Gross Production Value (constant) … square kilometre SLC

Congo
5,755 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Mauritius
6,361 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Congo rank
34th
Mauritius rank
32nd

Food: Gross Production Value (constant) … square kilometre SLC over time

  • Congo
  • Mauritius
2.0k4.0k6.0k196119922023

How they compare

Mauritius currently reports 6,361 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 5,755 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Congo, a difference of 606 1000 SLC per square kilometre.

That makes Mauritius's figure about 1.1 times Congo's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Mauritius ahead.

Congo ranks 34th and Mauritius ranks 32nd of 142 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 1 and Mauritius in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Mauritius Difference Ahead
1960s 1,738 1000 SLC per square kilometre 4,594 1000 SLC per square kilometre 2,856 1000 SLC per square kilometre Mauritius
1970s 1,910 1000 SLC per square kilometre 5,040 1000 SLC per square kilometre 3,131 1000 SLC per square kilometre Mauritius
1980s 2,395 1000 SLC per square kilometre 5,139 1000 SLC per square kilometre 2,744 1000 SLC per square kilometre Mauritius
1990s 2,631 1000 SLC per square kilometre 5,826 1000 SLC per square kilometre 3,195 1000 SLC per square kilometre Mauritius
2000s 3,687 1000 SLC per square kilometre 6,374 1000 SLC per square kilometre 2,687 1000 SLC per square kilometre Mauritius
2010s 5,229 1000 SLC per square kilometre 6,192 1000 SLC per square kilometre 963.09 1000 SLC per square kilometre Mauritius
2020s 5,702 1000 SLC per square kilometre 5,681 1000 SLC per square kilometre 20.87 1000 SLC per square kilometre Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand slc), per, Congo or Mauritius?
Mauritius, at 6,361 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 5,755 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Congo as of 2023.
What is the difference in food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand slc), per between Congo and Mauritius?
606 1000 SLC per square kilometre, with Mauritius ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Mauritius?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Congo and Mauritius rank globally for food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand slc), per?
Congo ranks 34th and Mauritius ranks 32nd of 142 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Mauritius: Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/food-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/mauritius/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/food-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/mauritius/">Congo vs Mauritius: Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
142 places, 8,031 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.