Chile vs Sri Lanka: Food: Gross Production Value (constant) … square kilometre SLC

Chile
13,308 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Sri Lanka
13,182 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Chile rank
22nd
Sri Lanka rank
23rd

Food: Gross Production Value (constant) … square kilometre SLC over time

  • Chile
  • Sri Lanka
2.5k5.0k7.5k10.0k12.5k15.0k196119922023

How they compare

Chile currently reports 13,308 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 13,182 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Sri Lanka, a difference of 126 1000 SLC per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Sri Lanka ahead.

Chile ranks 22nd and Sri Lanka ranks 23rd of 142 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 3 and Sri Lanka in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Sri Lanka Difference Ahead
1960s 3,796 1000 SLC per square kilometre 4,107 1000 SLC per square kilometre 311.51 1000 SLC per square kilometre Sri Lanka
1970s 4,324 1000 SLC per square kilometre 5,066 1000 SLC per square kilometre 742.13 1000 SLC per square kilometre Sri Lanka
1980s 5,427 1000 SLC per square kilometre 6,358 1000 SLC per square kilometre 930.94 1000 SLC per square kilometre Sri Lanka
1990s 8,115 1000 SLC per square kilometre 7,489 1000 SLC per square kilometre 625.41 1000 SLC per square kilometre Chile
2000s 10,842 1000 SLC per square kilometre 8,630 1000 SLC per square kilometre 2,213 1000 SLC per square kilometre Chile
2010s 12,634 1000 SLC per square kilometre 11,698 1000 SLC per square kilometre 935.51 1000 SLC per square kilometre Chile
2020s 13,285 1000 SLC per square kilometre 13,679 1000 SLC per square kilometre 394.38 1000 SLC per square kilometre Sri Lanka

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand slc), per, Chile or Sri Lanka?
Chile, at 13,308 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 13,182 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Sri Lanka as of 2023.
What is the difference in food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand slc), per between Chile and Sri Lanka?
126 1000 SLC per square kilometre, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Sri Lanka?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Chile and Sri Lanka rank globally for food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand slc), per?
Chile ranks 22nd and Sri Lanka ranks 23rd of 142 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Sri Lanka: Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/food-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square-kilometre/chile/sri-lanka/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/food-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square-kilometre/chile/sri-lanka/">Chile vs Sri Lanka: Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
142 places, 8,031 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.