Cambodia vs Rwanda: Food: Gross Production Value (constant) … square kilometre SLC

Cambodia
245,216 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Rwanda
120,272 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Cambodia rank
3rd
Rwanda rank
5th

Food: Gross Production Value (constant) … square kilometre SLC over time

  • Cambodia
  • Rwanda
0100.0k200.0k300.0k196119922023

How they compare

Cambodia currently reports 245,216 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 120,272 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Rwanda, a difference of 124,944 1000 SLC per square kilometre.

That makes Cambodia's figure about 2.0 times Rwanda's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Cambodia ahead.

Cambodia ranks 3rd and Rwanda ranks 5th of 142 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Cambodia averaged higher in 4 and Rwanda in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cambodia Rwanda Difference Ahead
1960s 62,714 1000 SLC per square kilometre 39,304 1000 SLC per square kilometre 23,409 1000 SLC per square kilometre Cambodia
1970s 48,289 1000 SLC per square kilometre 56,812 1000 SLC per square kilometre 8,523 1000 SLC per square kilometre Rwanda
1980s 47,476 1000 SLC per square kilometre 75,457 1000 SLC per square kilometre 27,981 1000 SLC per square kilometre Rwanda
1990s 66,586 1000 SLC per square kilometre 73,636 1000 SLC per square kilometre 7,050 1000 SLC per square kilometre Rwanda
2000s 102,277 1000 SLC per square kilometre 99,283 1000 SLC per square kilometre 2,995 1000 SLC per square kilometre Cambodia
2010s 212,222 1000 SLC per square kilometre 115,806 1000 SLC per square kilometre 96,416 1000 SLC per square kilometre Cambodia
2020s 233,973 1000 SLC per square kilometre 118,437 1000 SLC per square kilometre 115,536 1000 SLC per square kilometre Cambodia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand slc), per, Cambodia or Rwanda?
Cambodia, at 245,216 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 120,272 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Rwanda as of 2023.
What is the difference in food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand slc), per between Cambodia and Rwanda?
124,944 1000 SLC per square kilometre, with Cambodia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and Rwanda?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Cambodia and Rwanda rank globally for food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand slc), per?
Cambodia ranks 3rd and Rwanda ranks 5th of 142 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cambodia vs Rwanda: Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/food-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square-kilometre/cambodia/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/food-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square-kilometre/cambodia/rwanda/">Cambodia vs Rwanda: Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
142 places, 8,031 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.