Burundi vs Rwanda: Food: Gross Production Value (constant) … square kilometre SLC

Burundi
156,370 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Rwanda
120,272 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Burundi rank
4th
Rwanda rank
5th

Food: Gross Production Value (constant) … square kilometre SLC over time

  • Burundi
  • Rwanda
50.0k100.0k150.0k196119922023

How they compare

Burundi currently reports 156,370 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 120,272 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Rwanda, a difference of 36,098 1000 SLC per square kilometre.

That makes Burundi's figure about 1.3 times Rwanda's.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Burundi ahead.

Burundi ranks 4th and Rwanda ranks 5th of 142 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Burundi averaged higher in 5 and Rwanda in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Burundi Rwanda Difference Ahead
1960s 55,073 1000 SLC per square kilometre 39,304 1000 SLC per square kilometre 15,769 1000 SLC per square kilometre Burundi
1970s 63,016 1000 SLC per square kilometre 56,812 1000 SLC per square kilometre 6,204 1000 SLC per square kilometre Burundi
1980s 73,932 1000 SLC per square kilometre 75,457 1000 SLC per square kilometre 1,524 1000 SLC per square kilometre Rwanda
1990s 83,222 1000 SLC per square kilometre 73,636 1000 SLC per square kilometre 9,586 1000 SLC per square kilometre Burundi
2000s 87,297 1000 SLC per square kilometre 99,283 1000 SLC per square kilometre 11,986 1000 SLC per square kilometre Rwanda
2010s 122,553 1000 SLC per square kilometre 115,806 1000 SLC per square kilometre 6,747 1000 SLC per square kilometre Burundi
2020s 158,298 1000 SLC per square kilometre 118,437 1000 SLC per square kilometre 39,861 1000 SLC per square kilometre Burundi

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand slc), per, Burundi or Rwanda?
Burundi, at 156,370 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 120,272 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Rwanda as of 2023.
What is the difference in food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand slc), per between Burundi and Rwanda?
36,098 1000 SLC per square kilometre, with Burundi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and Rwanda?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Burundi and Rwanda rank globally for food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand slc), per?
Burundi ranks 4th and Rwanda ranks 5th of 142 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Burundi vs Rwanda: Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/food-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square-kilometre/burundi/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/food-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square-kilometre/burundi/rwanda/">Burundi vs Rwanda: Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
142 places, 8,031 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.