Bhutan vs Iceland: Food: Gross Production Value (constant) … square kilometre SLC

Bhutan
360.32 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Iceland
318.45 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Bhutan rank
72nd
Iceland rank
73rd

Food: Gross Production Value (constant) … square kilometre SLC over time

  • Bhutan
  • Iceland
200300400500600196119922023

How they compare

Bhutan currently reports 360.32 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 318.45 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Iceland, a difference of 41.87 1000 SLC per square kilometre.

That makes Bhutan's figure about 1.1 times Iceland's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Bhutan has been ahead every year.

Bhutan ranks 72nd and Iceland ranks 73rd of 142 countries.

Bhutan has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bhutan Iceland Difference Ahead
1960s 231.56 1000 SLC per square kilometre 196.37 1000 SLC per square kilometre 35.19 1000 SLC per square kilometre Bhutan
1970s 286.01 1000 SLC per square kilometre 219.54 1000 SLC per square kilometre 66.47 1000 SLC per square kilometre Bhutan
1980s 379.06 1000 SLC per square kilometre 227.53 1000 SLC per square kilometre 151.53 1000 SLC per square kilometre Bhutan
1990s 443.89 1000 SLC per square kilometre 205.43 1000 SLC per square kilometre 238.46 1000 SLC per square kilometre Bhutan
2000s 432.8 1000 SLC per square kilometre 252.5 1000 SLC per square kilometre 180.3 1000 SLC per square kilometre Bhutan
2010s 516.39 1000 SLC per square kilometre 302.98 1000 SLC per square kilometre 213.41 1000 SLC per square kilometre Bhutan
2020s 423.68 1000 SLC per square kilometre 317.56 1000 SLC per square kilometre 106.11 1000 SLC per square kilometre Bhutan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand slc), per, Bhutan or Iceland?
Bhutan, at 360.32 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 318.45 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Iceland as of 2023.
What is the difference in food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand slc), per between Bhutan and Iceland?
41.87 1000 SLC per square kilometre, with Bhutan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Iceland?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Bhutan and Iceland rank globally for food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand slc), per?
Bhutan ranks 72nd and Iceland ranks 73rd of 142 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bhutan vs Iceland: Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/food-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square-kilometre/bhutan/iceland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/food-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square-kilometre/bhutan/iceland/">Bhutan vs Iceland: Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
142 places, 8,031 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.