Barbados vs Uruguay: Food: Gross Production Value (constant) … square kilometre SLC

Barbados
665.08 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Uruguay
722.61 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Barbados rank
59th
Uruguay rank
58th

Food: Gross Production Value (constant) … square kilometre SLC over time

  • Barbados
  • Uruguay
200400600800196119922023

How they compare

Uruguay currently reports 722.61 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 665.08 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Barbados, a difference of 57.53 1000 SLC per square kilometre.

That makes Uruguay's figure about 1.1 times Barbados's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Barbados ahead.

Barbados ranks 59th and Uruguay ranks 58th of 142 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Barbados averaged higher in 5 and Uruguay in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Barbados Uruguay Difference Ahead
1960s 686 1000 SLC per square kilometre 336.76 1000 SLC per square kilometre 349.24 1000 SLC per square kilometre Barbados
1970s 698.61 1000 SLC per square kilometre 364.67 1000 SLC per square kilometre 333.94 1000 SLC per square kilometre Barbados
1980s 704.69 1000 SLC per square kilometre 392.81 1000 SLC per square kilometre 311.88 1000 SLC per square kilometre Barbados
1990s 665.2 1000 SLC per square kilometre 476.19 1000 SLC per square kilometre 189.02 1000 SLC per square kilometre Barbados
2000s 630.47 1000 SLC per square kilometre 597.61 1000 SLC per square kilometre 32.86 1000 SLC per square kilometre Barbados
2010s 633.54 1000 SLC per square kilometre 790.91 1000 SLC per square kilometre 157.37 1000 SLC per square kilometre Uruguay
2020s 632.67 1000 SLC per square kilometre 791.1 1000 SLC per square kilometre 158.43 1000 SLC per square kilometre Uruguay

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand slc), per, Barbados or Uruguay?
Uruguay, at 722.61 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 665.08 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Barbados as of 2023.
What is the difference in food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand slc), per between Barbados and Uruguay?
57.53 1000 SLC per square kilometre, with Uruguay ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Uruguay?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Barbados and Uruguay rank globally for food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand slc), per?
Barbados ranks 59th and Uruguay ranks 58th of 142 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Barbados vs Uruguay: Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/food-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square-kilometre/barbados/uruguay/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/food-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square-kilometre/barbados/uruguay/">Barbados vs Uruguay: Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
142 places, 8,031 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.