Portugal vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Food: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) … capita SLC

Portugal
0.6541 1000 SLC per person
in 2024
Saint Kitts and Nevis
0.6922 1000 SLC per person
in 2024
Portugal rank
115th
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
113th

Food: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) … capita SLC over time

  • Portugal
  • Saint Kitts and Nevis
00.20.40.60.8196119922024

How they compare

Saint Kitts and Nevis currently reports 0.6922 1000 SLC per person against 0.6541 1000 SLC per person in Portugal, a difference of 0.0381 1000 SLC per person.

That makes Saint Kitts and Nevis's figure about 1.1 times Portugal's.

The two have swapped places 11 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Portugal ahead.

Portugal ranks 115th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 113th of 142 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Portugal averaged higher in 3 and Saint Kitts and Nevis in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Portugal Saint Kitts and Nevis Difference Ahead
1960s 0.53 1000 SLC per person 0.4051 1000 SLC per person 0.1249 1000 SLC per person Portugal
1970s 0.5311 1000 SLC per person 0.5236 1000 SLC per person 0.0075 1000 SLC per person Portugal
1980s 0.496 1000 SLC per person 0.5969 1000 SLC per person 0.1009 1000 SLC per person Saint Kitts and Nevis
1990s 0.5611 1000 SLC per person 0.5779 1000 SLC per person 0.0168 1000 SLC per person Saint Kitts and Nevis
2000s 0.5448 1000 SLC per person 0.3945 1000 SLC per person 0.1503 1000 SLC per person Portugal
2010s 0.569 1000 SLC per person 0.627 1000 SLC per person 0.058 1000 SLC per person Saint Kitts and Nevis
2020s 0.6492 1000 SLC per person 0.6873 1000 SLC per person 0.0381 1000 SLC per person Saint Kitts and Nevis

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand slc), per, Portugal or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
Saint Kitts and Nevis, at 0.6922 1000 SLC per person against 0.6541 1000 SLC per person in Portugal as of 2024.
What is the difference in food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand slc), per between Portugal and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
0.0381 1000 SLC per person, with Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Portugal and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Portugal and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand slc), per?
Portugal ranks 115th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 113th of 142 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Portugal vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/food-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-capita/portugal/st-kitts-and-nevis/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/food-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-capita/portugal/st-kitts-and-nevis/">Portugal vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per capita
Unit
1000 SLC per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
142 places, 8,171 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.