Rwanda vs Sri Lanka: Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per

Rwanda
132.92 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Sri Lanka
124.73 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Rwanda rank
13th
Sri Lanka rank
15th

Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per over time

  • Rwanda
  • Sri Lanka
255075100125150196119922023

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 132.92 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 124.73 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Sri Lanka, a difference of 8.19 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.1 times Sri Lanka's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Rwanda ahead.

Rwanda ranks 13th and Sri Lanka ranks 15th of 172 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Rwanda averaged higher in 6 and Sri Lanka in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Rwanda Sri Lanka Difference Ahead
1960s 33.99 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 29.81 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 4.19 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Rwanda
1970s 50.25 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 36.77 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 13.49 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Rwanda
1980s 70.42 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 46.16 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 24.27 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Rwanda
1990s 69.86 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 72.15 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.3 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Sri Lanka
2000s 100.9 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 89.22 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 11.68 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Rwanda
2010s 126.36 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 117.81 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 8.55 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Rwanda
2020s 130.93 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 128.56 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.37 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), per, Rwanda or Sri Lanka?
Rwanda, at 132.92 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 124.73 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Sri Lanka as of 2023.
What is the difference in food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), per between Rwanda and Sri Lanka?
8.19 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Sri Lanka?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Rwanda and Sri Lanka rank globally for food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), per?
Rwanda ranks 13th and Sri Lanka ranks 15th of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Rwanda vs Sri Lanka: Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/food-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/rwanda/sri-lanka/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/food-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/rwanda/sri-lanka/">Rwanda vs Sri Lanka: Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
173 places, 9,830 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.