Qatar vs Zimbabwe: Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per

Qatar
15.29 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
17.11 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Qatar rank
121st
Zimbabwe rank
118th

Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per over time

  • Qatar
  • Zimbabwe
051015196119922023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 17.11 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 15.29 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Qatar, a difference of 1.82 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times Qatar's.

Across all 61 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.

Qatar ranks 121st and Zimbabwe ranks 118th of 172 countries.

Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Qatar Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 0.8526 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.41 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.56 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1970s 1.07 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 3.84 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.77 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1980s 2.34 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 4.15 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.81 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1990s 5.84 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 9.05 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 3.21 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2000s 6.01 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 10.88 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 4.87 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2010s 9.62 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 13.01 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 3.39 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2020s 15.06 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 16.29 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.23 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), per, Qatar or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 17.11 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 15.29 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Qatar as of 2023.
What is the difference in food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), per between Qatar and Zimbabwe?
1.82 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Qatar and Zimbabwe?
61 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Qatar and Zimbabwe rank globally for food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), per?
Qatar ranks 121st and Zimbabwe ranks 118th of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Qatar vs Zimbabwe: Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/food-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/qatar/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/food-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/qatar/zimbabwe/">Qatar vs Zimbabwe: Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
173 places, 9,830 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.