Jamaica vs Portugal: Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per

Jamaica
80.91 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Portugal
83.27 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Jamaica rank
33rd
Portugal rank
32nd

Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per over time

  • Jamaica
  • Portugal
020406080196119922023

How they compare

Portugal currently reports 83.27 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 80.91 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Jamaica, a difference of 2.36 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 21 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Jamaica ahead.

Jamaica ranks 33rd and Portugal ranks 32nd of 172 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Jamaica averaged higher in 5 and Portugal in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Jamaica Portugal Difference Ahead
1960s 52.99 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 52.37 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.6151 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Jamaica
1970s 53.62 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 52.55 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.07 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Jamaica
1980s 53.3 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 54.3 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Portugal
1990s 69.5 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 63.79 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 5.71 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Jamaica
2000s 71.37 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 63.6 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 7.78 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Jamaica
2010s 72.33 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 67.63 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 4.7 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Jamaica
2020s 78.42 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 79.66 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.23 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Portugal

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), per, Jamaica or Portugal?
Portugal, at 83.27 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 80.91 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Jamaica as of 2023.
What is the difference in food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), per between Jamaica and Portugal?
2.36 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Portugal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Jamaica and Portugal?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Jamaica and Portugal rank globally for food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), per?
Jamaica ranks 33rd and Portugal ranks 32nd of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Jamaica vs Portugal: Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/food-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/jamaica/portugal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/food-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/jamaica/portugal/">Jamaica vs Portugal: Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
173 places, 9,830 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.