Iceland vs Mauritania: Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per

Iceland
1.75 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Mauritania
1 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Iceland rank
167th
Mauritania rank
169th

Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per over time

  • Iceland
  • Mauritania
0.511.52196119922023

How they compare

Iceland currently reports 1.75 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 1 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Mauritania, a difference of 0.75 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Iceland's figure about 1.7 times Mauritania's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Iceland has been ahead every year.

Iceland ranks 167th and Mauritania ranks 169th of 172 countries.

Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iceland Mauritania Difference Ahead
1960s 1.32 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.313 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.01 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Iceland
1970s 1.44 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3103 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.13 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Iceland
1980s 1.44 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3924 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.05 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Iceland
1990s 1.22 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4654 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.752 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Iceland
2000s 1.41 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.6315 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.7824 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Iceland
2010s 1.69 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.8114 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.8798 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Iceland
2020s 1.76 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.9597 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.8023 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Iceland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), per, Iceland or Mauritania?
Iceland, at 1.75 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 1 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Mauritania as of 2023.
What is the difference in food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), per between Iceland and Mauritania?
0.75 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Iceland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Mauritania?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Iceland and Mauritania rank globally for food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), per?
Iceland ranks 167th and Mauritania ranks 169th of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Iceland vs Mauritania: Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/food-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/iceland/mauritania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/food-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/iceland/mauritania/">Iceland vs Mauritania: Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
173 places, 9,830 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.