Hungary vs Malawi: Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per

Hungary
97.5 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Malawi
104.78 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Hungary rank
25th
Malawi rank
22nd

Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per over time

  • Hungary
  • Malawi
050100150196119922023

How they compare

Malawi currently reports 104.78 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 97.5 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Hungary, a difference of 7.28 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Malawi's figure about 1.1 times Hungary's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 58 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Hungary ahead.

Hungary ranks 25th and Malawi ranks 22nd of 172 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Hungary averaged higher in 6 and Malawi in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hungary Malawi Difference Ahead
1960s 81.7 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 7.3 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 74.4 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Hungary
1970s 106.48 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 10.55 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 95.94 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Hungary
1980s 132.36 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 12.64 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 119.72 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Hungary
1990s 107.42 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 19.72 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 87.7 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Hungary
2000s 99.81 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 33.66 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 66.15 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Hungary
2010s 96.45 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 69.62 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 26.83 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Hungary
2020s 91.92 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 101.06 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 9.14 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Malawi

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), per, Hungary or Malawi?
Malawi, at 104.78 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 97.5 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Hungary as of 2023.
What is the difference in food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), per between Hungary and Malawi?
7.28 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Malawi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hungary and Malawi?
58 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Hungary and Malawi rank globally for food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), per?
Hungary ranks 25th and Malawi ranks 22nd of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hungary vs Malawi: Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/food-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/hungary/malawi/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/food-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/hungary/malawi/">Hungary vs Malawi: Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
173 places, 9,830 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.