Haiti vs New Zealand: Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per

Haiti
61.13 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
New Zealand
64.04 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Haiti rank
53rd
New Zealand rank
52nd

Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per over time

  • Haiti
  • New Zealand
20406080196119922023

How they compare

New Zealand currently reports 64.04 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 61.13 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Haiti, a difference of 2.91 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Haiti ahead.

Haiti ranks 53rd and New Zealand ranks 52nd of 172 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Haiti averaged higher in 6 and New Zealand in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Haiti New Zealand Difference Ahead
1960s 37.02 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 24.98 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 12.03 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Haiti
1970s 44.9 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 29.9 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 14.99 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Haiti
1980s 50.35 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 35.34 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 15.01 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Haiti
1990s 44.92 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 40.09 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 4.83 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Haiti
2000s 53.28 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 50.78 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.5 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Haiti
2010s 70.25 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 60.41 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 9.83 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Haiti
2020s 60.41 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 64.58 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 4.17 1000 Int$ per square kilometre New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), per, Haiti or New Zealand?
New Zealand, at 64.04 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 61.13 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Haiti as of 2023.
What is the difference in food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), per between Haiti and New Zealand?
2.91 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Haiti and New Zealand?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Haiti and New Zealand rank globally for food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), per?
Haiti ranks 53rd and New Zealand ranks 52nd of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Haiti vs New Zealand: Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/food-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/haiti/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/food-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/haiti/new-zealand/">Haiti vs New Zealand: Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
173 places, 9,830 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.