Guinea-Bissau vs Samoa: Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per

Guinea-Bissau
18.03 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Samoa
18.2 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Guinea-Bissau rank
113th
Samoa rank
111th

Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per over time

  • Guinea-Bissau
  • Samoa
0102030196119922023

How they compare

Samoa currently reports 18.2 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 18.03 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Guinea-Bissau, a difference of 0.17 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

Across all 56 years both countries report, Samoa has been ahead every year.

Guinea-Bissau ranks 113th and Samoa ranks 111th of 172 countries.

Samoa has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guinea-Bissau Samoa Difference Ahead
1960s 4.53 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 21.56 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 17.03 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Samoa
1970s 4.37 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 23.78 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 19.41 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Samoa
1980s 5.95 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 27.19 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 21.24 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Samoa
1990s 8.43 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 22.25 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 13.82 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Samoa
2000s 11.12 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 24.05 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 12.94 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Samoa
2010s 15.93 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 23.03 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 7.1 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Samoa
2020s 17.81 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 18.3 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4957 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Samoa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), per, Guinea-Bissau or Samoa?
Samoa, at 18.2 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 18.03 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Guinea-Bissau as of 2023.
What is the difference in food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), per between Guinea-Bissau and Samoa?
0.17 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Samoa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Samoa?
56 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Guinea-Bissau and Samoa rank globally for food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), per?
Guinea-Bissau ranks 113th and Samoa ranks 111th of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guinea-Bissau vs Samoa: Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/food-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/guinea-bissau/samoa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/food-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/guinea-bissau/samoa/">Guinea-Bissau vs Samoa: Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
173 places, 9,830 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.