Grenada vs Portugal: Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per

Grenada
80.8 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Portugal
83.27 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Grenada rank
34th
Portugal rank
32nd

Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per over time

  • Grenada
  • Portugal
0255075100196119922023

How they compare

Portugal currently reports 83.27 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 80.8 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Grenada, a difference of 2.47 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Grenada ahead.

Grenada ranks 34th and Portugal ranks 32nd of 172 countries.

Grenada has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Grenada Portugal Difference Ahead
1960s 87.66 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 52.37 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 35.29 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Grenada
1970s 93.3 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 52.55 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 40.75 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Grenada
1980s 91.68 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 54.3 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 37.38 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Grenada
1990s 86.05 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 63.79 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 22.26 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Grenada
2000s 67.58 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 63.6 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 3.98 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Grenada
2010s 78.94 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 67.63 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 11.31 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Grenada
2020s 83.93 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 79.66 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 4.27 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Grenada

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), per, Grenada or Portugal?
Portugal, at 83.27 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 80.8 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Grenada as of 2023.
What is the difference in food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), per between Grenada and Portugal?
2.47 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Portugal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Grenada and Portugal?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Grenada and Portugal rank globally for food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), per?
Grenada ranks 34th and Portugal ranks 32nd of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Grenada vs Portugal: Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/food-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/grenada/portugal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/food-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/grenada/portugal/">Grenada vs Portugal: Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
173 places, 9,830 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.