Bangladesh vs Malta: Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per

Bangladesh
370.64 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Malta
225.06 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Bangladesh rank
1st
Malta rank
3rd

Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per over time

  • Bangladesh
  • Malta
100200300400196119922023

How they compare

Bangladesh currently reports 370.64 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 225.06 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Malta, a difference of 145.58 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Bangladesh's figure about 1.6 times Malta's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Malta ahead.

Bangladesh ranks 1st and Malta ranks 3rd of 172 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Bangladesh averaged higher in 1 and Malta in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bangladesh Malta Difference Ahead
1960s 74.84 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 198.83 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 123.99 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Malta
1970s 84.88 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 244.47 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 159.59 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Malta
1980s 102.83 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 272.39 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 169.56 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Malta
1990s 126.77 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 345.51 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 218.74 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Malta
2000s 185.85 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 343.47 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 157.62 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Malta
2010s 276.23 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 288.49 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 12.26 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Malta
2020s 350.17 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 227.9 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 122.27 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Bangladesh

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), per, Bangladesh or Malta?
Bangladesh, at 370.64 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 225.06 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Malta as of 2023.
What is the difference in food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), per between Bangladesh and Malta?
145.58 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Bangladesh ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Malta?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Bangladesh and Malta rank globally for food — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), per?
Bangladesh ranks 1st and Malta ranks 3rd of 172 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bangladesh vs Malta: Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/food-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/bangladesh/malta/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/food-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/bangladesh/malta/">Bangladesh vs Malta: Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
173 places, 9,830 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Food — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.