China, Taiwan Province of vs Philippines: Food and Accommodation Away From Home (FAAFH) — Transportation and

China, Taiwan Province of
1,605 million LCU
in 2015
Philippines
1,378 million LCU
in 2015
China, Taiwan Province of rank
16th
Philippines rank
17th

Food and Accommodation Away From Home (FAAFH) — Transportation and over time

  • China, Taiwan Province of
  • Philippines
5001.0k1.5k200520102015

How they compare

China, Taiwan Province of currently reports 1,605 million LCU against 1,378 million LCU in Philippines, a difference of 227 million LCU.

That makes China, Taiwan Province of's figure about 1.2 times Philippines's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2005 it was China, Taiwan Province of ahead.

China, Taiwan Province of ranks 16th and Philippines ranks 17th of 63 countries.

China, Taiwan Province of has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Taiwan Province of Philippines Difference Ahead
2000s 1,211 million LCU 601.5 million LCU 609.84 million LCU China, Taiwan Province of
2010s 1,320 million LCU 1,137 million LCU 182.89 million LCU China, Taiwan Province of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher food and accommodation away from home (faafh) — transportation and, China, Taiwan Province of or Philippines?
China, Taiwan Province of, at 1,605 million LCU against 1,378 million LCU in Philippines as of 2015.
What is the difference in food and accommodation away from home (faafh) — transportation and between China, Taiwan Province of and Philippines?
227 million LCU, with China, Taiwan Province of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Taiwan Province of and Philippines?
11 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2015.
How do China, Taiwan Province of and Philippines rank globally for food and accommodation away from home (faafh) — transportation and?
China, Taiwan Province of ranks 16th and Philippines ranks 17th of 63 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Food and Accommodation Away From Home (FAAFH) — Transportation and storage — Operating surplus — Value Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Taiwan Province of vs Philippines: Food and Accommodation Away From Home (FAAFH) — Transportation and. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/food-and-accommodation-away-from-home-faafh-transportation-and-storage-operating-surplus-3/china-taiwan-province-of/philippines/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/food-and-accommodation-away-from-home-faafh-transportation-and-storage-operating-surplus-3/china-taiwan-province-of/philippines/">China, Taiwan Province of vs Philippines: Food and Accommodation Away From Home (FAAFH) — Transportation and</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Food and Accommodation Away From Home (FAAFH) — Transportation and storage — Operating surplus — Value Local Currency
Unit
million LCU
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
65 places, 716 data points, 2005–2020
Last refreshed

This domain contains data on three food value measures, namely: (1) Food At Home (FAH); (2) Food and Tobacco at Home (FTAH); (3) Food and Accommodation Away From Home (FAAFH), disaggregated by four primary factors (Operating Surplus, Labor, Taxes, Imports) and by five food value chain industries (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; Manufacture of food, beverages and tobacco products; Transportation and storage; Wholesale and retail trade; Accommodation and food service activities). The three food value measures differ for the bundle of goods and services they account for. In particular, the FAH refers to domestic expenditures of personal consumption for food consumed at home, at purchaser prices. The FTAH measure is similar in its target, but it refers to a broader set of economic goods, inclusive of tobacco, as food and tobacco expenditures are not always separable in the original data. On the other side, the FAAFH refers to domestic expenditures of personal consumption for food consumed away from home (e.g. in restaurants), at purchaser prices, and it also includes expenditures for accommodation in all the cases where the two types of expenditures were not separable in the original data. The values of industry decomposition measure the food production value-added distribution across different industries and factors involved in the agri-food value chain. All these estimates are based on Leontief Input Ouput modeling and Industry reduction method. The Food Value Chain domain aims to supply informaiton relevant for the SDG 12 - sustainable consumption and production patterns, SDG 2 - zero hunger and SDG 1 - no poverty, that constitue guiding SDGs in the FAO Strategic Framework 2022-2031 and its better production pillar. More in general they may inform national, regional and global food policy, including measures in the World Food Summit framework. Data are collected from national Supply and Use Tables (SUTs) and Industry by Industry Input Output tables (IOTs), via OECD database or NSOs. All input data are in line with the System of National Accounts (SNA) and main international classifications and standards related to environmental-economic accounting (respectively the System of Environmental-Economic Accounting for Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, SEEA AFF, and the International Standard Industrial Classification of All Economic Activities, ISIC).