China, Hong Kong SAR vs Saudi Arabia: Food and Accommodation Away From Home (FAAFH) — Accommodation and

China, Hong Kong SAR
547.52 million SLC
in 2015
Saudi Arabia
404.02 million SLC
in 2014
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
40th
Saudi Arabia rank
42nd

Food and Accommodation Away From Home (FAAFH) — Accommodation and over time

  • China, Hong Kong SAR
  • Saudi Arabia
200400600800200520102015

How they compare

China, Hong Kong SAR currently reports 547.52 million SLC against 404.02 million SLC in Saudi Arabia, a difference of 143.5 million SLC.

That makes China, Hong Kong SAR's figure about 1.4 times Saudi Arabia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.

China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 40th and Saudi Arabia ranks 42nd of 60 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, China, Hong Kong SAR averaged higher in 1 and Saudi Arabia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Hong Kong SAR Saudi Arabia Difference Ahead
2000s 610.03 million SLC 388.39 million SLC 221.63 million SLC China, Hong Kong SAR
2010s 384.3 million SLC 645.53 million SLC 261.22 million SLC Saudi Arabia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher food and accommodation away from home (faafh) — accommodation and, China, Hong Kong SAR or Saudi Arabia?
China, Hong Kong SAR, at 547.52 million SLC against 404.02 million SLC in Saudi Arabia as of 2015.
What is the difference in food and accommodation away from home (faafh) — accommodation and between China, Hong Kong SAR and Saudi Arabia?
143.5 million SLC, with China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Saudi Arabia?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Saudi Arabia rank globally for food and accommodation away from home (faafh) — accommodation and?
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 40th and Saudi Arabia ranks 42nd of 60 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Food and Accommodation Away From Home (FAAFH) — Accommodation and food service activities — Taxes — Value SLC, 2015 prices. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Hong Kong SAR vs Saudi Arabia: Food and Accommodation Away From Home (FAAFH) — Accommodation and. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/food-and-accommodation-away-from-home-faafh-accommodation-and-food-service-activities-16/china-hong-kong-sar/saudi-arabia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/food-and-accommodation-away-from-home-faafh-accommodation-and-food-service-activities-16/china-hong-kong-sar/saudi-arabia/">China, Hong Kong SAR vs Saudi Arabia: Food and Accommodation Away From Home (FAAFH) — Accommodation and</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Food and Accommodation Away From Home (FAAFH) — Accommodation and food service activities — Taxes — Value SLC, 2015 prices
Unit
million SLC
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
62 places, 664 data points, 2005–2020
Last refreshed

This domain contains data on three food value measures, namely: (1) Food At Home (FAH); (2) Food and Tobacco at Home (FTAH); (3) Food and Accommodation Away From Home (FAAFH), disaggregated by four primary factors (Operating Surplus, Labor, Taxes, Imports) and by five food value chain industries (Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; Manufacture of food, beverages and tobacco products; Transportation and storage; Wholesale and retail trade; Accommodation and food service activities). The three food value measures differ for the bundle of goods and services they account for. In particular, the FAH refers to domestic expenditures of personal consumption for food consumed at home, at purchaser prices. The FTAH measure is similar in its target, but it refers to a broader set of economic goods, inclusive of tobacco, as food and tobacco expenditures are not always separable in the original data. On the other side, the FAAFH refers to domestic expenditures of personal consumption for food consumed away from home (e.g. in restaurants), at purchaser prices, and it also includes expenditures for accommodation in all the cases where the two types of expenditures were not separable in the original data. The values of industry decomposition measure the food production value-added distribution across different industries and factors involved in the agri-food value chain. All these estimates are based on Leontief Input Ouput modeling and Industry reduction method. The Food Value Chain domain aims to supply informaiton relevant for the SDG 12 - sustainable consumption and production patterns, SDG 2 - zero hunger and SDG 1 - no poverty, that constitue guiding SDGs in the FAO Strategic Framework 2022-2031 and its better production pillar. More in general they may inform national, regional and global food policy, including measures in the World Food Summit framework. Data are collected from national Supply and Use Tables (SUTs) and Industry by Industry Input Output tables (IOTs), via OECD database or NSOs. All input data are in line with the System of National Accounts (SNA) and main international classifications and standards related to environmental-economic accounting (respectively the System of Environmental-Economic Accounting for Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, SEEA AFF, and the International Standard Industrial Classification of All Economic Activities, ISIC).