Ecuador vs Tonga: Fishing (central government expenditure) — Value Standard Local
Fishing (central government expenditure) — Value Standard Local over time
- Ecuador
- Tonga
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 10.82 million SLC against 9.98 million SLC in Tonga, a difference of 0.84 million SLC.
That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.1 times Tonga's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Ecuador ahead.
Ecuador ranks 50th and Tonga ranks 51st of 74 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 1 and Tonga in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Tonga | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 14.08 million SLC | 4.41 million SLC | 9.67 million SLC | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 8.66 million SLC | 8.88 million SLC | 0.222 million SLC | Tonga |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fishing (central government expenditure) — value standard local, Ecuador or Tonga?
- Ecuador, at 10.82 million SLC against 9.98 million SLC in Tonga as of 2024.
- What is the difference in fishing (central government expenditure) — value standard local between Ecuador and Tonga?
- 0.84 million SLC, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Tonga?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2024.
- How do Ecuador and Tonga rank globally for fishing (central government expenditure) — value standard local?
- Ecuador ranks 50th and Tonga ranks 51st of 74 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Fishing (central government expenditure) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.