Brazil vs Dominican Republic: Fishing (central government expenditure) — Value Standard Local
Fishing (central government expenditure) — Value Standard Local over time
- Brazil
- Dominican Republic
How they compare
Dominican Republic currently reports 242.68 million SLC against 241.17 million SLC in Brazil, a difference of 1.51 million SLC.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Brazil ahead.
Brazil ranks 33rd and Dominican Republic ranks 32nd of 74 countries.
Dominican Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Dominican Republic | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 74.45 million SLC | 138.27 million SLC | 63.81 million SLC | Dominican Republic |
| 2020s | 74.69 million SLC | 198.09 million SLC | 123.39 million SLC | Dominican Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fishing (central government expenditure) — value standard local, Brazil or Dominican Republic?
- Dominican Republic, at 242.68 million SLC against 241.17 million SLC in Brazil as of 2024.
- What is the difference in fishing (central government expenditure) — value standard local between Brazil and Dominican Republic?
- 1.51 million SLC, with Dominican Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Dominican Republic?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2024.
- How do Brazil and Dominican Republic rank globally for fishing (central government expenditure) — value standard local?
- Brazil ranks 33rd and Dominican Republic ranks 32nd of 74 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Fishing (central government expenditure) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.