Angola vs Russian Federation: Fishing (central government expenditure) — Value Standard Local
Fishing (central government expenditure) — Value Standard Local over time
- Angola
- Russian Federation
How they compare
Russian Federation currently reports 11,813 million SLC against 11,023 million SLC in Angola, a difference of 790 million SLC.
That makes Russian Federation's figure about 1.1 times Angola's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Angola ahead.
Angola ranks 10th and Russian Federation ranks 9th of 74 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Angola averaged higher in 1 and Russian Federation in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Angola | Russian Federation | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 11,429 million SLC | 14,409 million SLC | 2,979 million SLC | Russian Federation |
| 2020s | 13,508 million SLC | 11,099 million SLC | 2,409 million SLC | Angola |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fishing (central government expenditure) — value standard local, Angola or Russian Federation?
- Russian Federation, at 11,813 million SLC against 11,023 million SLC in Angola as of 2021.
- What is the difference in fishing (central government expenditure) — value standard local between Angola and Russian Federation?
- 790 million SLC, with Russian Federation ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Russian Federation?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2021.
- How do Angola and Russian Federation rank globally for fishing (central government expenditure) — value standard local?
- Angola ranks 10th and Russian Federation ranks 9th of 74 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Fishing (central government expenditure) — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Statistics Division of FAO collects annually data on Government Expenditure on Agriculture through a questionnaire, which was developed in partnership with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The IMF is the responsible institution for the Government Finance Statistics (GFS) methodology and annually collects GFS data, including Expenditure by Functions of Government (COFOG). The Classification of the Functions of Government (COFOG) is an international classification developed by Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and published by the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), with the aim of categorise governments' functions according to their purposes. The FAO questionnaire aligns with Table 7 of the IMF GFS questionnaire, replicates the relevant aggregates and drills down to request additional detail related to Agriculture. The FAO dataset consists of a time series, from 2001 onwards, of Total Government Expenditure and expenditure in: Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting, along with its three disaggregated subsectors of Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing; and Environmental Protection. In addition, expenditure in each detailed function are further disaggregated into Recurrent and Capital expenditure. Additional indicators include the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure, and the Agriculture Orientation Index (ratio between the Agriculture Share of Government Expenditure and the Agriculture Value Added as Share of GDP). Data are reported for the highest level of government available (Consolidated general government, consolidated central government or budgetary central government) and are available for about 100 countries on a regular basis.