Pakistan vs United Republic of Tanzania: Fish, Seafood — Food

Pakistan
334 1000 t
in 2023
United Republic of Tanzania
426 1000 t
in 2023
Pakistan rank
55th
United Republic of Tanzania rank
51st

Fish, Seafood — Food over time

  • Pakistan
  • United Republic of Tanzania
0100200300400201020162023

How they compare

United Republic of Tanzania currently reports 426 1000 t against 334 1000 t in Pakistan, a difference of 92 1000 t.

That makes United Republic of Tanzania's figure about 1.3 times Pakistan's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 14 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Pakistan ahead.

Pakistan ranks 55th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 51st of 194 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Pakistan averaged higher in 1 and United Republic of Tanzania in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Pakistan United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
2010s 359.5 1000 t 348.9 1000 t 10.6 1000 t Pakistan
2020s 334 1000 t 426 1000 t 92 1000 t United Republic of Tanzania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher fish, seafood — food, Pakistan or United Republic of Tanzania?
United Republic of Tanzania, at 426 1000 t against 334 1000 t in Pakistan as of 2023.
What is the difference in fish, seafood — food between Pakistan and United Republic of Tanzania?
92 1000 t, with United Republic of Tanzania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Pakistan and United Republic of Tanzania?
14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
How do Pakistan and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for fish, seafood — food?
Pakistan ranks 55th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 51st of 194 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Fish, Seafood — Food. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Pakistan vs United Republic of Tanzania: Fish, Seafood — Food. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fish-seafood-food/pakistan/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/fish-seafood-food/pakistan/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Pakistan vs United Republic of Tanzania: Fish, Seafood — Food</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Fish, Seafood — Food
Unit
1000 t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
224 places, 3,046 data points, 2010–2023
Last refreshed

A food balance sheet presents a comprehensive picture of the pattern of a country's food supply during a specified reference period. The food balance sheet shows for each food item - i.e. each primary commodity and a number of processed commodities potentially available for human consumption - the sources of supply and its utilization. The total quantity of foodstuffs produced in a country added to the total quantity imported and adjusted to any change in stocks that may have occurred since the beginning of the reference period gives the supply available during that period. On the utilization side a distinction is made between the quantities exported, fed to livestock, used for seed, put to manufacture for food use and non-food uses, losses during storage and transportation, and food supplies available for human consumption. The per caput supply of each such food item available for human consumption is then obtained by dividing the respective quantity by the related data on the population actually partaking of it. Data on per capita food supplies are expressed in terms of quantity and - by applying appropriate food composition factors for all primary and processed products - also in terms of caloric value and protein and fat content.