Aruba vs Togo: Fish landings and discards
Aruba
2.96
in 2018
Togo
1.21
in 2018
Aruba rank
150th
Togo rank
152nd
Fish landings and discards over time
- Aruba
- Togo
How they compare
Aruba currently reports 2.96 against 1.21 in Togo, a difference of 1.75.
That makes Aruba's figure about 2.5 times Togo's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 60 shared years of data; in 1959 it was Togo ahead.
Aruba ranks 150th and Togo ranks 152nd of 157 countries.
Togo has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | Togo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | 6.15 | 96 | 89.85 | Togo |
| 1960s | 6.72 | 119.39 | 112.67 | Togo |
| 1970s | 16.55 | 244.67 | 228.12 | Togo |
| 1980s | 17.32 | 424.44 | 407.12 | Togo |
| 1990s | 8.78 | 415.14 | 406.36 | Togo |
| 2000s | 4.71 | 194.73 | 190.02 | Togo |
| 2010s | 2.97 | 152.55 | 149.58 | Togo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fish landings and discards, Aruba or Togo?
- Aruba, at 2.96 against 1.21 in Togo as of 2018.
- What is the difference in fish landings and discards between Aruba and Togo?
- 1.75, with Aruba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Togo?
- 60 years are reported by both, from 1959 to 2018.
- How do Aruba and Togo rank globally for fish landings and discards?
- Aruba ranks 150th and Togo ranks 152nd of 157 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Fish landings and discards. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.