Aruba vs Jordan: Fish landings and discards
Aruba
2.96
in 2018
Jordan
4.6
in 1989
Aruba rank
150th
Jordan rank
148th
Fish landings and discards over time
- Aruba
- Jordan
How they compare
Jordan currently reports 4.6 against 2.96 in Aruba, a difference of 1.64.
That makes Jordan's figure about 1.6 times Aruba's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 40 shared years of data; in 1950 it was Jordan ahead.
Aruba ranks 150th and Jordan ranks 148th of 157 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Aruba averaged higher in 1 and Jordan in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | Jordan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | 6.15 | 38.98 | 32.83 | Jordan |
| 1960s | 6.72 | 105.5 | 98.78 | Jordan |
| 1970s | 16.55 | 52.73 | 36.18 | Jordan |
| 1980s | 17.32 | 9.08 | 8.24 | Aruba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fish landings and discards, Aruba or Jordan?
- Jordan, at 4.6 against 2.96 in Aruba as of 1989.
- What is the difference in fish landings and discards between Aruba and Jordan?
- 1.64, with Jordan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Jordan?
- 40 years are reported by both, from 1950 to 1989.
- How do Aruba and Jordan rank globally for fish landings and discards?
- Aruba ranks 150th and Jordan ranks 148th of 157 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Fish landings and discards. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.